amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #11131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11131#discussion_r1813980941
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/ManifestFilterManager.java:
##########
@@ -323,11 +345,15 @@ private ManifestFile filterManifest(Schema tableSchema,
ManifestFile manifest) {
PartitionSpec spec = reader.spec();
PartitionAndMetricsEvaluator evaluator =
new PartitionAndMetricsEvaluator(tableSchema, spec,
deleteExpression);
+ boolean hasDeletedFiles =
manifestsReferencedForDeletes.contains(manifest.path());
+ if (hasDeletedFiles) {
Review Comment:
Sounds good, I think what we could do is filter manager surfaces the
referenced manifests if all the removals are performed with a referenced
manifest location. Then in merging snapshot producer we leverage that set to
filter down the set that gets passed to the filter manager to begin with. I
still think this particular case would be a good optimization (the case where a
file is known to be in a manfiest referenced in a delete) so that we avoid
opening up the manifest and evaluating stats etc, and just skip to rewriting
the manifest.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
