Fokko commented on code in PR #10501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10501#discussion_r1641671117
##########
.palantir/revapi.yml:
##########
@@ -1024,6 +1024,38 @@ acceptedBreaks:
old: "class org.apache.iceberg.types.Types.NestedField"
new: "class org.apache.iceberg.types.Types.NestedField"
justification: "new Constructor added"
+ org.apache.iceberg:iceberg-core:
Review Comment:
Do we still need to add these rules if the break is justified (going to the
deprecation process), or am I overestimating the abilities of rev-api here? :D
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
