rodmeneses commented on code in PR #9346:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9346#discussion_r1433134831
##########
flink/v1.18/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/FlinkConfigOptions.java:
##########
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ private FlinkConfigOptions() {}
public static final ConfigOption<SplitAssignerType>
TABLE_EXEC_SPLIT_ASSIGNER_TYPE =
ConfigOptions.key("table.exec.iceberg.split-assigner-type")
.enumType(SplitAssignerType.class)
- .defaultValue(SplitAssignerType.SIMPLE)
+ .defaultValue(null)
Review Comment:
good catch.
I changed that to null, as we had an assertion before:
```
if (splitAssignerFactory != null) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(
watermarkColumn == null,
"Watermark column and SplitAssigner should not be set in the
same source");
}
```
however, after my work on this PR, it is safe to remove the above assertion,
since we will override the factory with a `OrderedSplitAssignerFactory` when
the `watermarkColumn` is specified
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
