[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17291892#comment-17291892
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-8971:
---------------------------------------

kirklund commented on a change in pull request #6052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6052#discussion_r583849886



##########
File path: 
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/BucketRegionQueue.java
##########
@@ -478,6 +478,25 @@ public Object peek() {
     }
   }
 
+  public boolean isThereEventsMatching(Predicate matchingPredicate) {
+    getInitializationLock().readLock().lock();
+    try {
+      if (this.getPartitionedRegion().isDestroyed()) {
+        throw new BucketRegionQueueUnavailableException();
+      }
+      Iterator<Object> it = this.eventSeqNumDeque.iterator();

Review comment:
       [comment] Another syntax to consider if you're not familiar with it:
   ```
         for (Object o : eventSeqNumDeque) {
           Object object = optimalGet(o);
   ```

##########
File path: 
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/BucketRegionQueue.java
##########
@@ -478,6 +478,25 @@ public Object peek() {
     }
   }
 
+  public boolean isThereEventsMatching(Predicate matchingPredicate) {

Review comment:
       Predicate is a parameterized:
   ```
   public boolean isThereEventsMatching(Predicate<Object> matchingPredicate) {
   ```
   Giving it a type (even just `Object`) will remove warnings (I'm seeing 
warnings about it in IntelliJ).
   
   In general, you should always try to avoid raw types.

##########
File path: 
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/wan/parallel/ParallelGatewaySenderQueue.java
##########
@@ -1797,6 +1816,22 @@ public static String getSenderId(String regionName) {
     return regionName.substring(1, queueStringStart);
   }
 
+  public boolean isThereEventsMatching(Object object, Predicate condition) {

Review comment:
       If you know that `object` is always a `GatewaySenderEventImpl` then it 
would be better to use that in the method signature:
   ```
   public boolean isThereEventsMatching(GatewaySenderEventImpl value, 
Predicate<Object> condition) {
   ```
   ...rather than casting it on the 1st line of the method.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Batches with incomplete transactions when stopping the gateway sender
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-8971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8971
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wan
>    Affects Versions: 1.14.0
>            Reporter: Alberto Gomez
>            Assignee: Alberto Gomez
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> When the gateway sender is stopped there is a high probability that batches 
> with incomplete transactions are sent even if group-transaction-events is 
> enabled.
> The reason is that once the stop command reaches the gateway sender, it 
> immediately stops queueing events, and this could happen in the middle of 
> receiving events for the same transaction. If this is the case, some events 
> for the transaction may have reached the queue right before the stop command 
> was received and the rest of events for that transaction would not make it to 
> the queue (they would be dropped) because they arrived right after the stop 
> command was received at the gateway sender.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to