+1
Same here. We have users which don't have a chance for some reasons to
upgrade to the latest OS X version, therefore we are using Qt 5.8
(instead of Qt 5.9 LTS which we are using across other OSs) to support
at least OSX 10.9.
So I vote for support older OS X versions as long as possible.
On 11/29/2017 3:08 PM, coroberti . wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Hamish Moffatt
<ham...@risingsoftware.com> wrote:
On 29/11/17 14:46, Jake Petroules wrote:
Why do you need to support older versions?
Because my customers are using them, right back to 10.7. They are
educational institutions with whole labs of machines set up the same way -
they probably get one chance a year to upgrade, and for whatever reason they
haven't so far. I can't stick to old Qt versions either because of various
bugs. 5.6 LTS has issues with accessibility crashes on newer macOS. 5.8 is
crashing in file open dialogs on 10.13. Thus I'm stuck.
Exactly, my case with edu users.
They are using Mac HW for up to 10 years.
About 1/3 is not upgradeable anymore: 10.7 and 10.8
I wish there was a bit more of a time window before you deprecate old
versions. 10.7 is no older than Windows 7.
+1
Kind regards,
Robert
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
