Of course not. ;-) On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:38:18AM +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
> On 16/06/2012, at 7:56 PM, warg...@gmx.de wrote: > > > >> ...and keeping the Q prefix is also be a big win... > > > > Don't think so. Qt belongs to Microsoft now (sort of). It is not > > beyond them to use trademark threads to throw a spanner in the > > works. The name might be different enough so the have no chance to > > win, but could the community fight such a battle? So why risk it? > > > sorry, Qt does not belong to Microsoft. Neither does Nokia. > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
