15.06.2012, 19:42, "Till Oliver Knoll" <till.oliver.kn...@gmail.com>: > 2012/6/15 Jason H <scorp...@yahoo.com>: > >> Bleak? I was annoyed when Nokia took over TT, because substantial the >> resources got moved to mobile. And I hated the preferred >> Symbian-was-the-favoriate updates. >> >> ..., especially web services (consuming/providing) ... > > That's not so bad. After all, Qt was initially invented as a *desktop* > framework. And I'm still glad that it is one of the most pleasant > cross-platform ones to use! > > Anyway, I guess today, if you were serious about "web apps" (yes, I > know, quite a stretch from "web services", you'd go the HTML 5 way... > > Qt/C++ on a server? Web Services? XML? Agree, that could get some love > (I'm not an actual user in those area though - the Qt streaming XML > parser is good enough for me). > >> ... Glad the mobile distraction is over with. Let's get back to taking on >> .Net and Java.. > > Talking about which: if you were one of the unlucky ones to have bet > on the MS Silverlight horse - well, bad luck: it's dead! Microsoft > decided that HTML 5 is the way to go... Java on the webbrowser? Long > time dead! JSP? Well, I'm still using it for that ;) Java on the > desktop? Dead... (at least on the Mac you sure will win the price of > the "Most Loved App").
Don't confuse "dead" and "out of trend". Even if java applets and desktop applications are not "mainstream" for a long time, they are still usable and are being used by some folks. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
