On 16/06/2012, at 7:56 PM, warg...@gmx.de wrote:

> 
>> ...and keeping the Q prefix is also be a big win... 
> 
> Don't think so. Qt belongs to Microsoft now (sort of). It is not beyond
> them to use trademark threads to throw a spanner in the works. The name
> might be different enough so the have no chance to win, but could the
> community fight such a battle? So why risk it?


sorry, Qt does not belong to Microsoft. Neither does Nokia.


_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to