On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 17.33.22, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote: > > These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny > > is a really good idea. And we have one, > > No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but > apparently is not complete or bug-free.
This also assumes that your artists are fine with the QtSvg rendering.
Depending on your artists and where else the same .svg files are used, that's
not possible.
If you have the artist developing these .svg files specifically for your
application, then what she sees in the drawing tool is irrelevant. It's the
QtSvg rendering that matters, so the artist will tweak the .svg file to produce
the wanted result.
If you are taking .svg files from elsewhere or if you're using QtSvg and
another renderer, then you will notice how QtSvg fails to show the same thing.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
