On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote: > These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny > is a really good idea. And we have one,
No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but apparently is not complete or bug-free. > and it works well for the kind > of simple GUI graphics that show up in touch interfaces and on toolbars. > So I ask again: What's the process for lobbying to keep QtSvg as a > supported implementation of SvgTiny? As Thiago said: Find someone to work on it, which probably means paying someone to work on/maintain the codebase outside the Nokia/Qt team. Andreas _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
