> Right, the 'mailstore-entities' (actually a cluster of two > machines sharing a raid-array) have to be redundant > themselves - as it was mentioned by Atif Ghaffar already. Is that even possible? I dont doubt your suggestion, I just didnt know that linux would support sharing the same array with n+1 machines. I was pretty sure that there would be file locking issues or something along those lines. Are there any specific restrictions on this? (type of FS used, type of array, etc) Im guessing that there is probably a website somewhere devoted to this topic, but if there is I havent found it yet. I have toyed with the idea of using a shared fiberchannel SAN for a long time, but I was pretty sure it wouldnt work (not to mention they are sort of expensive.. hehe.). Thanks! - Matt
- How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Courier) Barbara Greenwood
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Toens Bueker
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Atif Ghaffar
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Michael Lausch
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Toens Bueker
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Prune
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with... Michael Lausch
- RE: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Barbara Greenwood
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Matt Prigge
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with... Atif Ghaffar
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Walter Wong
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with... Jeremy Howard
- Re: How scalable is Cyrus? (and comparison with Cou... Toens Bueker