Barbara Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In what way?
>
> The next most highly loaded box is the one running Cyrus
> (a beefy PC running FreeBSD, BTW), at the busiest time
> it is running at 50% CPU utilisation and is not
> disk-bound. Ergo we expect that to be the next bottleneck.
You could add processors :-)
> >With several mailstores you multiply the probability of
> >failure - on the other hand most of the times not all
> >users will be affected by a crash.
>
> That's what we plan to do IF we stay with Cyrus - we already have the LDAP
> setup, it would just be a question of bringing another Cyrus server onstream
> and putting new users on it. But, AIUI, that wouldn't help us with
> redundancy.
Right, the 'mailstore-entities' (actually a cluster of two
machines sharing a raid-array) have to be redundant
themselves - as it was mentioned by Atif Ghaffar already.
by
Töns
--
Linux. The dot in /.
