Re: prohibiting RFC publication

[Keith Moore]

> > > The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
> >
> >that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
> >is it really true?  it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.
> 
> Let me jog your memory:

yes, I remember that wrec said there wasn't a conflict with its work.
that's not the same thing as wrec discussing whether the approach
is technically sound or whether the document is worthy of publication.

IMHO, that discussion doesn't belong in wrec.  but it's up to the ADs.

Keith