At 10:39 AM 10/04/00 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
>
>that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
>is it really true? it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.
Let me jog your memory:
At 06:29 PM 30/12/99 +0100, Patrik F�ltstr�m wrote:
>A request has arrived to publish the named document as informational RFC.
>The IESG wants all documents in this area to explicitely pass the WREC
>working group, ...
I then sought clarification, re-sent the document to WREC (it had been sent
before), to determine if there was a conflict - there wasn't. The authors
re-submitted it.
John
---------------------------------------------------------------
Network Appliance Direct / Voicemail: +31 23 567 9615
Kruisweg 799 Fax: +31 23 567 9699
NL-2132 NG Hoofddorp Main Office: +31 23 567 9600
---------------------------------------------------------------
