On Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:09:12 EDT, Peter Deutsch in Mountain View said:
> Well put. As Dave has pointed out earlier this weekend, there is a burning need
> for better, permanent access to the Drafts collection. If we had that, perhaps
> much of this discussion might become moot, since some of the out-on-a-limb
> stuff may be circulated in a less "official" form, but remain permanently and
What would be *really* helpful is if the various revisions of the
drafts and the working group e-mail archives were together, so that
I could answer questions with "That doesn't work, it was tried in
draft-ietf-foobar-07.txt, tossed in -08.txt, see <here> for the
discussion why..."
What would it take to make it doable?
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
- Re: prohibiting R... ned . freed
- Re: prohibiting R... Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting R... Pete Resnick
- Re: prohibiting R... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting R... Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC p... Karl Auerbach
- Re: prohibiting R... Fred Baker
- Re: prohibiting R... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting R... Tripp Lilley
- Re: prohibiting R... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: prohibiting R... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: prohibiting R... RJ Atkinson
- Re: prohibiting R... John Stracke
- Re: prohibiting R... Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting R... John Martin
- Re: prohibiting R... Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting R... John Martin
- Re: prohibiting R... Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting R... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publication... Doug Royer
- Re: recommendation against publication of d... Pyda Srisuresh
