On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 23:17 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 16:00 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 09:22 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> > > I agree with Diether and Daniel: Let's do as gtk+ does, even
> > > though
> > > they break the rules.
> > 
> > OK. Then I don't object anymore. Thanks for being patient. Feel
> > free
> > to
> > add API in the gtkmm-3-22 branch:
> > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/log/?h=gtkmm-3-22
> 
> I'm replying to this old thread because I don't think I mentioned
> this
> at the time:
> 
> We haven't actually added any API yet to gtkmm-3-22, though we have
> deprecated API in gtkmm-3-22. I found that there were not, and are
> not,
> actually any API additions in GTK+ 3.22, so I'd like to avoid them in
> gtkmm 3.22 unless there's a serious need.

Here is the link, for context, that I meant to paste:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2017-May/msg00014.html

-- 
Murray Cumming
murr...@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com

_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

Reply via email to