On 5 April 2017 at 15:00, Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 09:22 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote: > > I agree with Diether and Daniel: Let's do as gtk+ does, even though > > they break the rules. > > OK. Then I don't object anymore. Thanks for being patient. Feel free to > add API in the gtkmm-3-22 branch: > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/log/?h=gtkmm-3-22 Is the recently created glibmm-2-52 branch intended as an API-breaking/adding (within limits of what the C lib does) wrapper of GLib 2.50? Maybe then, based on this decision, that stuff should just be put in glibmm-2-50 anyway?
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
