On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 18:56 +0100, Daniel Boles wrote: > My next thought was that I have several, perhaps more, such patches > for glibmm too - which as of now were only allowed into master. If > patches like this were allowed in gtkmm (and I'll soon know the > answer!), to me it would make sense if glibmm made the same > allowance. > > I have most of these patches tagged on Bugzilla with the API tag, if > that helps. I probably missed one or two, though.
We have not released glibmm 2.52.0 yet (a version of glibmm-2.24). It's still unstable - the latest release is 2.51.6. Theoretically it should have been released already, but we didn't do that due to the GTK+4 confusion. We should release 2.52.0 fairly soon, I guess. https://git.gnome.org/browse/glibmm/log/?h=glibmm-2-52 Now would be the right time to add or deprecate API in glibmm-2.24, before we make that stable release. However, we cannot break ABI. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
