On Sat, 2017-05-06 at 18:08 +0100, Daniel Boles wrote:
> So it seems that the only option is to continue using C-style enums
> within classes, e.g. class Dialog { enum ResponseType{} } as
> present.. As someone already mentioned, I see no problem with this:
> such an enum is not inherently bad in itself; it's only bad if chosen
> in o s case where another solution (enum class, constexpr, etc.) is
> an available and more appropriate option. As that does not apply, the
> C-style enum should continue to serve this purpose well.The old style-enum won't let us change this, in gtkmm 3, Gtk::RESPONSE_OK into this, in gtkmm 4: Gtk::Dialog::Response::OK without also polluting the API with this Gtk::Dialog::OK Using an old-style enum would let us have this: Gtk::Dialog::RESPONSE_OK, (and Gtk::Dialog::Response::RESPONSE_OK) which is still an improvement, but not quite as nice. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
