On 19 April 2017 at 11:51, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote: > Den 2017-04-19 kl. 12:24, skrev Murray Cumming: > > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 10:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > You can also use a namespace to give them their own scope, which has > less overhead than a class type (no RTTI for the class, no way for > users to create instances of the class type, or pointers to it, which > would have no purpose if it's just being used to create a new scope > for the enumerators). > > Good point. > > I'm leaning towards this at the moment. > > Is it possible to define a namespace within a class?
No. _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
