On 23 May 2017 at 15:29, Daniel Boles <dboles....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 23 May 2017 at 15:12, Kjell Ahlstedt <kjellahlst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I don't understand how you can have, for instance >> void f(ResponseType r); >> if ResponseType is an uninstantiable class. If ResponseType is the name >> of a class, and you want to treat it as if it were the name an enum, >> wouldn't it require something like >> > > D'oh. Right! Carry on. :) > > The language seems to make this overcomplicated. I need to search for info > on whether anyone ever proposed a scoped but implicitly convertible enum, > and if so, why it never got anywhere. >
Then we'd have three types of enum ... that doesn't seem like it'd be an improvement.
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
