On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 15:42 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote: > Hi, > > just wondering if anyone has given any thought on C++11 features for > gtkmm. > > One thing that seems very unfortunate is that all objects are > non-movable (due to them being explicitly made non-copyable which then > also deletes the move constructor). [snip]
I believe it's possible to make classes movable but not copyable. That feels strange to me, but maybe that's just because I'm not using C++11 day to day. I hope that this wouldn't lead to code that looked too much like the widgets were being copied. I can imagine a lot of confusion from less experienced coders. A patch (in bugzilla) would probably be the best way to show us how this would be useful. I've just updated (rebased) my c++11 branch for glibmm and put it in the c++11v2 branch. So far it's mostly changes to examples to show how gtkmm-based code might look nicer: https://git.gnome.org/browse/glibmm/log/?h=c%2b%2b11v2 -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
