Hi,
I thought about using C++11 a lot in terms of gstreamermm - there is a lot
of places where new features should be used (e.g. rvalue references when
argument is transfer full etc.). Moreover, it will be easier, when I finish
work on using gobject-introspection in mm generators (it's going slow for
now because of lack of time, but I'll have more time in the following
year).
Unfortunately, using c++11 in gtkmm/glibmm might cause following problems:
- numerous people still use compilers which don't support c++11
- very often it requires modifying interface, and existing code won't work
with new version of libraries.
Personally, I'm fan of C++11 and 14 features, but last word belongs to
gtkmm/glibmm maintainers.
2014-12-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Christof Meerwald <cme...@cmeerw.org>:
> Hi,
>
> just wondering if anyone has given any thought on C++11 features for
> gtkmm.
>
> One thing that seems very unfortunate is that all objects are
> non-movable (due to them being explicitly made non-copyable which then
> also deletes the move constructor).
>
> Actually, what I was trying to do was to create an array of
> Gtk::Label, e.g.
>
> { Gtk::Label l[] { Gtk::Label{"1"}, Gtk::Label{"2"} }; }
>
> this one doesn't work because a Gtk::Label is neither copyable nor
> movable (but I think it should be movable) - the alternative
>
> { Gtk::Label l[] { {"1"}, {"2"} }; }
>
> doesn't work either because the constructor is marked explicit.
>
>
> I have only done a very cursory search through the mailing list
> archive, but haven't found much related. Any thoughts?
>
>
> Christof
>
> --
>
> http://cmeerw.org sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
> mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
>
--
Pozdrawiam
Marcin Kolny
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
