On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 09:21 -0700, Andrew Potter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Hubert Figuière <h...@figuiere.net> wrote: > > On 31/07/15 03:16 AM, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> Does anyone see any need for this in gtkmm? > >> > >> In theory, I guess we could make Gtk::Widget movable but not copyable, > >> so we could do things like this sometimes: > > > > > > I believe making Gtk::Widget movable (but not copyable) has a benefit > > and could be implemented without too much confusion if we are able to > > deal with "moved" Gtk::Widget properly - ie let the programmer know of > > the error (like when attenmpting to perform something with a Gtk::Widget > > no longer valid since we move it). > > I'd also like to see a movable Widget. It's not something I'd need > every day, but > it is really nice to have the flexibility to do a little more > unorthodox things when you > need to.
I'm open to the idea, but I'd like to see some small example of how this might be used, please. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
