On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:56:26 +0100 Daniel Glazman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30/10/2013 09:10, Reed Loden wrote: > > > The Planet team has always felt that Planet is meant to encompass > > whatever people wish to share from their blogs, not just Mozilla stuff. > > Not always. When my blog was syndicated on pmo, I was asked to create a > specific feed for english-only code-or-web-standards-only articles. It's > still the case today. My more personal articles are not syndicated on > pmo. I'm unable to find your original planet addition bug, but if that did happen to you, I'm sorry that was the case. You are more than welcome to submit a bug to modify your feed URL to be less specific (though, might be useful to keep it English only, just for the sake of the majority of people reading planet, but that's just my personal opinion). > > Please take a look at Mozilla's Community Participation Guidelines > > (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/participation/), > > especially the "Inclusion and Diversity" section. > > I'm raising this issue here exactly because of the next section of that > document, section ii. I have the feeling the number of religious posts > on bmo increase, month after month, become more proselyte, and I feel > this is wrong for diversity on one hand, and productivity of pmo > readers on another. While I don't keep up with planet as much as I used to (the volume has increased so much, and I have a real job that takes up much of my time), I definitely don't see many religious-type posts at all (just the occasional one here and there). Do you have any data to back up this feeling? ~reed _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
