bOn Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Asa Dotzler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/9/2013 7:44 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > It's my opinion that Mozilla has the freedom to build architecturally >> secure systems because it doesn't have a business model that is predicated >> on mining users' data, so making the data unavailable—even to Mozilla >> itself—isn't disruptive. >> > > This is an awful assumption. Our business model doesn't afford us the > freedom to ignore what most Internet users want. > I would amend Greg's statement to say "Mozilla has *more* freedom to build ..." Then I wholeheartedly agree that we have the opportunity to take a unique role here. Rob -- q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q" _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
