While I have never used it, I know of tahoe-lafs and a few related cloud
storage solutions that are supposed to "guarantee" privacy by ensuring
that data is spread among servers and that no single server has enough
information to be able to compromise the data.

Could this perhaps provide an element of solution, if said servers were
spread among several countries?

Cheers,
 David

On 6/10/13 9:32 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> This is an awful assumption. Our business model doesn't afford us the
> freedom to ignore what most Internet users want.
> 
> Users want easy access to their content from a variety of devices and
> services, and to be able to share content in a variety of ways.
> 
> These are not business models, they are requirements from our users.
> 
> We can bake in crypto and other security measures to make our features
> more secure only up until the point that it gets in the way of what
> users want from those features (and can easily get by launching the
> competitor browser(s) they all have sitting right next to ours.)
> 
> - A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance


-- 
David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
 Performance Team, Mozilla
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to