On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > One of the things that has disappointed me, however, is that many people are > not really aware of the degree that Mozilla's actions are protective: ... > But, in reality, what Mozilla has done is often much stronger: compared > to the alternatives, the design of services like Firefox Sync
Advertising the design of Firefox Sync at this point would make Mozilla look pretty bad when PICL replaces Sync with a weaker design (by default) in the name of usability and user expectations. Or put the other way: If the design of Firefox Sync is advertised now, it would make sense to commit to PICL having the same level of security by default. -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
