The listserver is managed by an unrelated company.  They would refuse to
look into the problem, as I have already asked them why messages arrive
so late at my mail server (i.e., two day delays sometimes) - and they
say it is my problem (at my ISP)!  At least in the case of describing my
problems, I can show them my headers and tell them when my mail server
received the messages.  In the case of Mail Archive, I have no headers
to show!!

But I am fairly certain that I have received all messages posted to the
listserve in question between 12-30 and today.  The messages I described
awhile back on Gossip were received by me, but were not archived by Mail
Archive. This is a common occurrence (on various of the WEDI listserve
archives).  I discover it quite frequently when attempting to refer
someone to a posting via URL - only to find the posting is missing from
the archive.

I suppose it's possible that I receive all messages (even if some are
delayed), while Mail Archive does not.

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 07 January, 2003 02:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Gossip] Some Messages not archived to wedi-transactions


On January 7, 2003 at 10:46, "William J. Kammerer" wrote:

> If you searched on this Message-ID in your logs, I would not have
> expected you to find a match because the Message-ID is specific to the
> recipient.  The header I showed are specific to me as recipient, and
the
> headers in the messages sent to archive@mail-archive.com would look
> somewhat different as the Lyris listserver assigns unique Message-IDs
> for every recipient.

IMHO, a questionable practice since it screws up references (for
discussion threads) and makes tracking delivery errors harder (like
in this case).

Looking at the header you did provide:

<LYRIS-14922627-168882-2003.01.02-15.00.40--wkammerer#novannet.com@lists
.wedi.org>

it could be implied that the ID for other users would be:

<LYRIS-14922627-168882-2003.01.02-15.00.40--[useraddress]@lists.wedi.org
>

where [useraddress] is the subscriber's address with @ replaced with
a #.  Therefore, I would guess the Message-ID for
archive@mail-archive.com
would be:

<LYRIS-14922627-168882-2003.01.02-15.00.40--archive#mail-archive.com@lis
ts.wedi.org>

Of course, this is just guessing.  Since a timestamp is part of the
ID, it could also vary if it is based on when the message sent to the
receipient.  Therefore, one may have to grep for something
like (using regex notation):

<LYRIS-14922627-168882-2003\.01\.02.*--archive#mail-archive\.com@lists\.
wedi\.org>

Assuming the day part is the same and only the time part could vary.
To be more general:

<LYRIS-14922627-168882-.*--archive#mail-archive\.com@lists\.wedi\.org>

If the "LYRIS-14922627-168882" is sufficiently random, the
above should be sufficient in searching for the message.  The
"archive#mail-archive\.com" could probably be dropped from the
expression to be extra forgiving and still avoid potential false
positives.


BTW, some list management software may not do auto-retries on a failed
mail delivery.  For example, for one list, if unable to deliver a
message, the list software sends a status message to the receipient of
the problem.  If repeated tries of sending the status message fail,
the address is auto-unsubscribed.  If successful, the status message
contains instructions for the receipient on how to retrieve the past
undeliverable messages.  Since mail-archive.com is all automated,
such manual retrieval methods would not be supported.

It seems that it would be more effective for you to check out your
listserver's delivery logs to track down the problem.  If such logs
do not exist, you may want to enable such a feature, if available,
to avoiding burdening mail-archive, and others, when troubleshooting
errors when it is not even clear if mail delivery to mail-archive
actually occurred for the messages in question.

--ewh


_______________________________________________
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip

Reply via email to