github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Incorrect NOT IN result due to inferred predicate pushdown over null-aware anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect NOT IN result due to inferred predicate pushdown over null-aware anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] LimitPushdown and sort pushdown re-create limit nodes without `required_ordering`, losing order-sensitivity for later passes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] LimitPushdown and sort pushdown re-create limit nodes without `required_ordering`, losing order-sensitivity for later passes [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT investigate benchmark 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT - investigate 21566 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] CI: extended tests don't run on changes to functions-aggregate / functions-window, which the aggregate and window fuzzers exercise [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CI: extended tests don't run on changes to functions-aggregate / functions-window, which the aggregate and window fuzzers exercise [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: multiply overflow in generate_series(DATE, DATE, INTERVAL) for dates far from 1970 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: generate_series table function overflows when integer step passes i64::MAX [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: generate_series overflow panics at i64 boundary and out-of-range dates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: ensure new_list respects data_type argument [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ensure new_list respects data_type argument [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ensure new_list respects data_type argument [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ensure new_list respects data_type argument [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ensure new_list respects data_type argument [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: parenthesize nested expression display names [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: parenthesize nested expression display names [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: parenthesize nested expression display names [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(parquet): remap sorting columns for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(parquet): remap sorting columns for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(parquet): remap sorting columns for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(parquet): remap sorting columns for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Parquet sorting columns use invalid indices for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Parquet sorting columns use invalid indices for partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add per-aggregate argument evaluation metrics for grouped hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add per-aggregate argument evaluation metrics for grouped hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add per-aggregate argument evaluation metrics for grouped hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support fully-native multi-stage (distinct-combined) collect_list / collect_set [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support fully-native multi-stage (distinct-combined) collect_list / collect_set [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] COUNT(*) over an empty grouping set with empty input returns 0 (should return 1) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): count empty grouping sets in the aggregate row estimate for an empty input [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 in /python [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 in /python [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • [PR] chore(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 in /python [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 in /python [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.85.8 to 2.85.10 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.85.8 to 2.85.10 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): bump swatinem/rust-cache from 2.9.1 to 2.9.2 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): bump swatinem/rust-cache from 2.9.1 to 2.9.2 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Rethinking Code Review and Testing in the Agent Era [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Rethinking Code Review and Testing in the Agent Era [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Draft: implement non-blocking morsel API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Draft: implement non-blocking morsel API [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(substrait): generate Substrait function YAML [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: make_array accepts inputs differing only in nested-field nullability [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: plumb SchemaProvider table_type through FFI [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] docs: move TopK user defined operator example into extending-operators guide [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: RIGHT/FULL/NATURAL JOIN USING does not coalesce the join key (returns NULL for right-only rows) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] User defined functions (udf) documentation improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: add 54.1.0 changelog to main [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add 54.1.0 changelog to main [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Add paging to GET /api/jobs on the scheduler and history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add paging to GET /api/jobs on the scheduler and history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add paging to GET /api/jobs on the scheduler and history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feat: add dictionaries as a supported group column type [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: add dictionaries as a supported group column type [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: add dictionaries as a supported group column type [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: add dictionaries as a supported group column type [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: add dictionaries as a supported group column type [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Store job event logs in an object store so history survives the scheduler [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Escape closing brackets in bracket-quoted identifiers [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] Fixed where binary expressions were passed in the wrong order when the null directions differed [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: optimize string contains function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] SortProperties::and_or claims orderings that Kleene AND/OR do not preserve [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SortProperties::and_or claims orderings that Kleene AND/OR do not preserve [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimize take_n on DictionaryGroupValuesColumn<K> [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: [branch-1.0] backport four bug fixes for 1.0.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: [branch-1.0] backport four bug fixes for 1.0.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Ballista 54.1.0 Release [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Ballista 54.1.0 release announcement blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Ballista 54.1.0 release announcement blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce per-file metadata overhead for wide-schema parquet scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce per-file metadata overhead for wide-schema parquet scans [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Merge EnforceDistribution + EnforceSorting into a single EnsureRequirements rule for correctness and idempotency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Merge EnforceDistribution + EnforceSorting into a single EnsureRequirements rule for correctness and idempotency [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Add wrapper classes for Expression types [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Inconsistent Explain units [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages