-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:32:41 +0100
Jan Matejka <y...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +0000
> "Robin H. Johnson" <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Questions:
> > 0. What names for the tree/repository.
> 
> git://anongit.gentoo.org/portage-tree.git ?
> 
> 1. afaik everyone is calling it this way already anyway.
> 
> 2. Since it is hosted directly on gentoo.org/ there should be no need
>    to further qualify it's The portage tree.
> 
> - --
> Jan Matějka        | Developer
> https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux


NO, NOT a chance...

It's already been said that it makes it too often confused with
portage the package manager.  Plus there are 2 other package managers
that work with that tree.  It is that ebuild tree that is the core to
what makes it a gentoo system.


AND the current repo_name is gentoo which many tools already expect it
to be.

SO the logical choice is for it to remain called gentoo.

But as far as the git repo is concerned, it can be a variation of that
and still be cloned into a 'gentoo' subdirectory for on disk use as
the main tree.

  be it gentoo-ebuilds, ebuilds/gentoo, trees/gentoo, repos/gentoo,...

The directory name it is installed to MUST be the same as it's
repo_name.

 $ git clone git://anongit.gentoo.org/gentoo-tree.git gentoo


The rsync tree generated from the git repo must also be set to clone
into a gentoo named directory.

- -- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0
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=42cr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to