On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
>> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
>> ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted
>> on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git.
>
> Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository.Everything is a git repo, but not everything is an ebuild/Portage repo... Which is another point against the use of repo in any Portage-specific way. Cheers, Dirkjan
