On 15-03-2015 11:20:45 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
> >> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
> >> ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted
> >> on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git.
> >
> > Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository.
>
> Everything is a git repo, but not everything is an ebuild/Portage
> repo... Which is another point against the use of repo in any
> Portage-specific way.tree/gentoo tree/prefix ... ? Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
