On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:32:04 +0200 Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Alexis Ballier schrieb: > > On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:32:56 +0200 > > Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> As the topic says, when someone converts an ebuild to multilib, > >> please dont disable binary building for other ABIs, as has already > >> been done for some packages. > >> > >> This will break e.g. for users who target 64bit toolchain and 32bit > >> userland, since those would not get any binaries from building for > >> none-default ABIs. > >> > > > > - submit a patch against multilib_is_native_abi for those corner > > cases > > huh? Please tell me, how a changed multilib_is_native_abi function > would help here. Either you restrict something to native abi or you > dont, having a check telling you "true - we are either native abi or > not" is not really usefull, is it? > native abi = the abi you want the binaries for and the one you always build your libs with... [...] > > > > no, we won't be building useless stuff to throw it away one > > minute later, thanks for the bloat. > > We already do it in many cases, just take complete package rebuilds > due to USE flag changes. Feel free to propose improvements to this, but it is unrelated I'm afraid. Let's emerge -e world after each sync just because we can :)
