Dnia 2013-08-09, o godz. 19:23:50 Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> Alexis Ballier schrieb: > > On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:32:04 +0200 > > Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> Alexis Ballier schrieb: > >>> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:32:56 +0200 > >>> Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> As the topic says, when someone converts an ebuild to multilib, > >>>> please dont disable binary building for other ABIs, as has already > >>>> been done for some packages. > >>>> > >>>> This will break e.g. for users who target 64bit toolchain and 32bit > >>>> userland, since those would not get any binaries from building for > >>>> none-default ABIs. > >>>> > >>> > >>> - submit a patch against multilib_is_native_abi for those corner > >>> cases > >> > >> huh? Please tell me, how a changed multilib_is_native_abi function > >> would help here. Either you restrict something to native abi or you > >> dont, having a check telling you "true - we are either native abi or > >> not" is not really usefull, is it? > >> > > > > native abi = the abi you want the binaries for and the one you always > > build your libs with... > > so tell me the native abi for this case: toolchain=64bit, userland=32bit Excuse me, but where does such configuration occur? I don't think Gentoo is providing stages like this. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
