On Wed, 1 May 2013 08:57:35 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ryan Hill wrote: > > Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey > > or a robot*. Anyone capable of reasoning could puzzle out the > > implications of not allowing user-given options to override the > > defaults. Obviously you can write code that follows a spec but is > > still broken or useless. > > > *or both (?!) > > Oh please... The person simply made a mistake, which happens when > programming, and which he fixed. No reason for calling him names. Sorry, I was under the impression that they were refusing to acknowledge it as a mistake on the grounds that it was allowed by the spec, despite the consequences, and demanding ebuilds to be "fixed" instead. I have other names for those people I could use but I doubt you'd like them any better. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
