>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ryan Hill wrote: > Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey > or a robot*. Anyone capable of reasoning could puzzle out the > implications of not allowing user-given options to override the > defaults. Obviously you can write code that follows a spec but is > still broken or useless.
> *or both (?!) Oh please... The person simply made a mistake, which happens when programming, and which he fixed. No reason for calling him names. Ulrich
