On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:29 +0000, David Leverton wrote: > On 14 March 2012 23:44, Greg KH <gre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Oh, and somehow "consensus" will work? No, sorry, it will not. > > No, logical analysis will, as I said in the rest of my post which you > conveniently ignored - either we conclude with evidence that there are > no issues, which should settle the matter for reasonable people, or we > discover that there are, in which case they have to be dealt with one > way or another. I really don't see how anyone can object to that, > unless they're worried they won't like the result.... > > > How about the basic FACT that today, such systems do not work > > This is debatable at best. You can keep screaming "but bluetooth > won't work!" until you're blue in the face, but that's not relevant at > all to people who don't use bluetooth.
That's true, but given the need to have a "one size fits all" boot system(for obvious practical reasons), such boot system needs to work with bluetooth input devices -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
