On 03/14/2012 05:36 PM, David Leverton wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 23:47, Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> It's more about what we're _not_ doing that what we're doing.
> 
> Clearly something must have changed in udev 181 to make
> /usr-without-initramfs not work anymore, and someone must have done
> something to make that change happen, unless udev has aquired the
> ability to evolve by itself.

You're pointing your finger at udev, but the udev change is just a
symptom of a more general shift away from supporting the "/ is a
self-contained boot disk that is independent of /usr" use case.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac

Reply via email to