Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Wulf C. Krueger <w...@mailstation.de> wrote: >> between both. This strengthening bridge of understanding can be seen in dev- >> zero's move to appoint ciaranm as his proxy for today's council meeting. >> > > Sorry to rain on your parade, but with ciaranm's consistent history, > allowing him to participate in Gentoo's discussions itself is a > privilege of patience on the part of the Gentoo community. >
I would believe that recent history would show the opposite. There seem to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm results in setting them off. Regardless of the technical merits of a solution they seem more interested in just derailing anything that might have anything to do with ciaramn. I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't see anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other members of the community take a look at themselves before spouting about the evils of ciaramn. > Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed > (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council), and reflects badly on the > candidate in question (dev-zero). > Not shared by everyone. > > -- > ~Nirbheek Chauhan > >
