On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:25 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500 > Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Christoph Mende wrote: > > > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > > > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. > > > > Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply > > "xfce.eclass"? Well, the desktop is usually called Xfce4, plus that'd match gnome2... and more or less kde4 > why bother introducing yet another xfce*.eclass when you can re-use an > existing one? > That's what I want to do :P We currently have xfce4.eclass, xfce42.eclass and xfce44.eclass. 42 and 44 are obviously versioned, 4 isn't, but isn't nearly compatible with my new one, partly because it was used (and probably exclusively written) for 4.2. -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
