On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500 Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph Mende wrote: > > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. > > Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply > "xfce.eclass"? why bother introducing yet another xfce*.eclass when you can re-use an existing one? -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
