Christoph Mende wrote: > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply "xfce.eclass"? -Joe
Christoph Mende wrote: > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply "xfce.eclass"? -Joe