On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I think virtual works just fine for kde-base/kde, too, if one > simply reads it literally -- it's a virtual package in that it > doesn't install anything itself, even if it's a meta-package rather > than having the meaning of the old-style virtual, that of selecting > one of many providers. So the only problem with virtual is the > narrower old meaning. Whether that's a big enough problem to worry > about is of course debatable, but I don't personally believe it is, > and find it every bit as clear and actually much less confusing than > zero-install-cost.
So what does 'virtual' actually mean then, and how is it related to the defined behaviour of this property? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
