-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michal Kurgan wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:49:12 -0700 > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The PROPERTIES approach still seems a lot simpler and practical to >> me. It seems to me that the approach involving categories introduces >> needless complexity without bringing any really useful benefits. > > Could you elaborate on this categories complexity? I think that the idea is to > just use already available categories, not implementing additional PROPERTY > for this functionality. >
Forcing a relationship with the category name seems more complex and less flexible than simply having the ability to define PROPERTIES=virtual in any given ebuild. - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki0xxMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOI1QCgz9yfDUaAH+KnpbhrXtl5qPSn sccAn0KTXUPhw54KIBIk6soFHNNEkOHB =xQQ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
