On 01-10-2007 22:59:40 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > I would like to propse a new versionator.eclass for consideration (attached). > > This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one > currently in portage. It also uses a lot less code and has the bonus of being > pure sh.
What is your rationale to say that "pure sh" is a "bonus"? Especially given the environment this is used in as ferdy already pointed out? I personally like consistency. So if we use bash in ebuilds, then I'd like to use bash in eclasses too. I'm interested in your motivation to make this eclass "pure sh", whatever that may mean. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
