On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This wouldn't have to be because you have a vested interest in paludis > and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no > reasonable way to support that?
Cut the conspiracy theories. Paludis will support whatever PMS says it should support. Released versions supported what PMS said at that time (which went in line with the Portage documentation), and the next release will support whatever PMS says then (which currently goes against the Portage documentation, but along with Portage behaviour). -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
