Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This wouldn't have to be because you have a vested interest in paludis >> and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no >> reasonable way to support that? >> > > Cut the conspiracy theories. Paludis will support whatever PMS says it > should support. Released versions supported what PMS said at that time > (which went in line with the Portage documentation), and the next > release will support whatever PMS says then (which currently goes > against the Portage documentation, but along with Portage behaviour). > > Ciaran,
You missed the bandwagon on trying to use the "conspiracy theories" phrase already. That happened a full 24 hrs ago. I'm sorry you were off-line. Next time try to come to the party on time, otherwise keep quiet. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
