On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:30:06 -0700 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote: > > I agree -r# is for ebuild changes not code changes. I remember a while > > back Portage would constantly use -r# instead of a 4th number and we > > worked at that to change that behavior since it was firmly established > > that -r# was for ebuild changes only. Not bumps in the code. > > > > Yeah stubbs loved that -rX :) Actually it was Nick, unfortunately the "tradition" was continued even after he left. Marius -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
