On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:22:14 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Perhaps not all of the council; distinctly recall diego pushing about | it though. Quick look through council logs, robbat2 was asking about | timeline also (jan. meeting specifically).
You've gotta ask *why* certain people are so keen on pushing it through... Perhaps if they explained why they needed it in such a hurry we would prioritise it differently. | > Several council member have access to it - including me - and | > are quite confident about what is already done. | | The question was specifically in regards to timelines; completion so | that ongoing paludis vs pkgcore vs portage crap can be put to rest. *shrug* I don't see PMS as being viable until there's a fully conformant independent implementation, personally. So that more or less means that for me, PMS will become a priority at around the same time that Paludis 1.0_pre is released. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
